Tuesday, January 27, 2026

“Northern Lights” Strat-O-Matic Pro Football cards for the 2025 CFL Season

 

Led by DB Rolan Milligan, Jr., Saskatchewan celebrates their win in the 112th Grey Cup

“Northern Lights”

Strat-O-Matic Pro Football cards for the 2025 CFL Season


CARDS Link to 2025CFL_print_rev4_v1_9_1.pdf


2025-Rosters.docx


QB Starts and CFL Schedule_2025.xlsx


Specific CFL_Penalties_and_Ejections_2a.pdf


Ejections_Chart for Game Misconduct Fouls (CFL Specific)


Fumble returns, Int returns, Rouges


CFL Final Raw Data


SOM PRO FOOTBALL LINKS


1981 CFL Retro Cards


For Stephen Beardslee, the genius behind the look and feel. 


Changes

It has been said that a quick turnaround in CFL team fortunes is often preceded by the hire of a hot offensive guru at head coach to match up with a new QB prospect.  This has been true in Ottawa in 2024 and Montreal in 2025, and it may prove true in Edmonton in 2026.  But it is also true that injuries and free agent losses can close a competitive window in Canadian Football just as quickly.  Nowhere was this more true than in Toronto, where off-season and post-Grey Cup raids on both sides of the Argo’s lines and the season-long 2025 absence of QB Chad Kelly denied the Boatmen a chance to repeat as champions.  Winnipeg lost its receiving depth, as standout WR Kenny Lawler’s move to Hamilton raised the bar for the Tiger-Cats and QB Bo Levi Mitchell. Excellent leaders such as Dru Brown of Ottawa and Zach Collaros of the Blue Bombers spent a lot of time on the sidelines, costing the Redblacks a possible playoff berth and the Blue Bombers a shot at their sixth straight Western Division title. Changes in both lineups and team fortunes were a constant in the 2025 CFL. 



In 2025, CFL Teams filled the sky with footballs 


Reappraisal

But for once in mid-season the big changes occurred off the field.  On September 22, 2025, CFL Commissioner Stewart Johnston announced that changes would be instituted over the next two seasons through a phased approach. The most significant modifications would come in 2027 with the goalposts being moved to the back of the end zone and the field being re-sized. In anticipation of these structural changes, and beginning in 2026, the rouge would be modified and adjustments would be introduced to ensure a more consistent game flow. 



CFL Commissioner Stewart Johnson


Reprisal 

These proposals started a firestorm of commentary, as people sought to both predict and place motives behind the actions. The overwhelming fear was that the Canadian game was being “Americanized” in an effort to make US Expansion a stronger possibility. A smaller field with more US friendly rules might be leveraged to place a tenth team somewhere in the Lower 48.  While expansion to a tenth team has long been the dream of many CFL fans, their ideal target locations would be somewhere in the Canadian Maritimes or in Saskatoon, out West. The idea that potential expansion might not include a National site thus infuriated long time fans of the Canadian sport. Rising political friction between the two nations had made this possibility untenable for many Canadians. 


There was more to it than just expansion, though. Canadian fields are used at the high school and collegiate level as well, and it was unclear at the time of the announcement what the plan might be for preparing and transitioning the existing lower levels of Canadian competition.  While the players came down on both sides of the issue, no less a critic than “Kid Canada”, Nathan Rourke, the BC quarterback and the preeminent Canadian-born CFL star, pointed out the real objection most people had was the lack of consultation with the various stakeholders before the decision was made. 


Resolution

The search for consensus in decision making is definitely uniquely Canadian; it will be interesting to see how these changes play out now that they are on paper and will soon take place on the field. 2025 is thus the last season we have with the nine traditional teams and (more or less) the traditional CFL rule set. The controversies did nothing to ruin the playing of the postseason- the Divisional games saw four outstanding and close contests, and the final between Montreal and Saskatchewan was a tremendous watch.  The victorious Roughriders of course are a classic franchise and are well-supported by their fan base, and their win put a bow on what had been an entertaining and competitive 2025 CFL season. 


Hamilton 11-7 

The 26 year winless streak continues.  The Tiger-Cats rode Eastern All Star QB Bo Levi Mitchell and a ball hawking defence to host the Eastern Finals, where it took the tough and opportunistic Montreal defence to hold them off 19-16 and deny them a Grey Cup appearance; the ‘Cats now still haven’t won the Cup since 1999.  Still, it was a great regular season.  Bo Levi Mitchell adeptly utilized former Winnipeg free agent Tim Lawler, who caught passes for over 1,400 yards and 14 scores, as well as his fellow receivers Tim White and Kiondre Smith, who also tallied over 1,000 yards each, to post a 5,000 yard passing season with a CFL- leading 36 passing major scores. Tailback Greg Bell chipped in 1,008 yards on the ground to give the team four thousand yard players. On defence Julian Howsare hounded enemy passers and the Hamilton secondary, led by All- Canada backs Jamal Peters and Stavros Katsontonis feasted on them, as the team led the CFL in interceptions.  



Hamilton’s Bo Levi Mitchell led the CFL in 2025 in passing yards and major scores


Montreal 10-8

The 2025 10-8 record for the Alouettes is deceptive; Montreal had some horses.  They had won the Cup in 2023 and finished 12-5-1 in 2024 before an error-prone loss to Toronto in the Eastern Finals, so much was expected from them in 2025. Behind new QB Davis Alexander the team won its first three games including the Eastern Final rematch with the Boatmen 28-10 in Week One. But Davis suffered from the injury bug, and after a 5-2 start the team stumbled behind three different backup quarterbacks to drop to 5-7, close to possible elimination. Through it all Canada’s top defence held firm.  Led by All- Canada LBs Tyrice Beverette  and Darnell Sankey, and safety Marc-Antoine DeQuoy, the Montreal defence allowed the least yards on the season. And when Alexander returned, the Alouettes started playing their usual brand of crisp error free football, as he spread the ball around to a group of talented receivers, led by All-Canada selection Tyler Snead, Tyson Philpot and Charleston Rambo. 


Montreal held off Winnipeg 42-33 in the East Semis and dropped Hamilton in a close one in the East Finals 19-16 to head to the Grey Cup to face Saskatchewan.  In Winnipeg in the Cup, Alexander thew three uncharacteristic interceptions in his first loss of his CFL career, and another late fumble cost the ALs the title. 



The Alouettes Defence, led by LB Tyrice Beverette, held firm all year. 


Toronto 5-13

What a difference a year makes! Defending champion Toronto lost starting QB Chad Kelly to a devastating injury before the 2024 Grey Cup, and perennial understudy QB Nick Arbuckle won the Championship with an MVP performance. But the off-season was disastrous for the Argos, as teams raided the Boatmen for experienced linemen and backs.  The depleted roster dropped close contests early in the year to start 2-8 in spite of a good year from Arbuckle. He threw for over 4000 yards and 26 touchdowns, but received little help from Canada’s worst running game or a defence that allowed 583 points. While Derek Slewa played an exciting brand of football in his first professional year at safety and on returns, and “Touchdown Jake” Herslow caught nine majors in six games, and rookie Kevin Mital had 102 receptions to tie for the lead in the CFL, problems up front doomed the Argos to a last place finish in rushing yards and sacks allowed.  Only a miracle 63 yard catch with one second remaining by Dejon Brissett to set up a Labour Day comeback win against the rival Tiger-Cats kept the defending champs from falling into the East’s basement. 


Ottawa 4-14

One year after winning a 2024 spot in the Eastern Playoffs, injuries, turnovers, and poor special teams play doomed the RedBlacks to last place in the East at 4-14.  The team featured a pair of Eastern All-Star receivers in Eugene Lewis and Justin Hardy, and a good young quarterback in Dru Brown, but Brown was frequently injured and threw more interceptions than is normally helpful, finishing at two wins and seven losses in his starts for the year. It was his backup, Dustin Crum who had the better season, as he won two of his six starts on his “no holds barred” scrambling ability. In both of his wins Ottawa came from behind; coining the term “Crumback”, which owing to its popularity, may be with us for awhile.  The offence did not get much help from runners William Stanback or Daniel Adeboboye, but I would not count either out in 2026. A lot of talent dots this roster, particularly on the defensive line, and if they can improve their league- worst pass rush and shore up their offensive line, they could be a winner once again. 



Both Geno Lewis and Justin Hardy made the 2025 East All Star team for Ottawa. 


Saskatchewan 12-6

Melonheads rejoice! The Saskatchewan Roughriders had lost the 97th Grey Cup in 2009 against the Alouettes due to a "too many men on the field" penalty on the final play, a costly (and infamous) illegal substitution that gave Montreal  kicker  Damon Duval a second chance at a game-winning field goal, which he made to win 28-27 after missing the first attempt. But they did not fail in the key moments in the 2025 112th Grey Cup. Nursing a 25-17 lead and with the Als inside their five, the Roughriders defence avenged that loss and forced and recovered a fumble by Montreal short yardage specialist Shea Patterson to clinch their first Grey Cup win since 2013. 


Saskatchewan’s roster was dotted with experienced players who, over their careers, have seen it all. Led by 39 year old signal caller Trevor Harris, who completed 72.3 pct of his passes for 4569 yards and 24 scores.  Harris has now been in the CFL for 13 years and has found a home in Saskatchewan and his intelligent and cerebral approach drove the Roughriders to championship heights.  Harris was able to leverage 1,000 yard receivers Dohnte Meyers and Keesean Johnson, allowing the team to overcome injuries to Mitchell Picton and Sam Emilus. The Riders had three All Canadian linemen up front in Jamarcus Hardrick, Jacob Brammer, and Logan Fenland, and they opened running lanes for A.J. Ouellette, who rushed for 1,222 yards and 8 major scores on the ground.  With so much veteran talent Saskatchewan was able to post the key major scores to gain the leads in both the Eastern Finals and the Grey Cup, and their defence, the best in the West and Canada’s toughest against the run, was able to make good in each contest to win the Championship. 



Saskatchewan’s rugged defence forced the biggest play of the 112th Grey Cup, a short yardage fumble at the goal line. 


BC 11-7

The Lions had two seasons- an early slow start that saw them drop to below .500 at 5-7, and then a 6-0 finish keyed by their defensive emergence and an explosive passing attack.  The defence was keyed by their pass rush, led by defensive player of the year Mathieu Betts, who topped the league in sacks with 15, just three short of his own CFL record; the passing attack was led by Nathan Rourke, the first Canadian quarterback to win the Most Outstanding Player award since Russ Jackson claimed it while playing with the old Ottawa Rough Riders in 1969.  



The 2025 MOP, BC Quarterback Nathan Rourke


BC added in two All-Canada receivers in Keon Hatcher and Justin McInness, plus a very dangerous downfield receiver in Ayden Eberhard and the underrated Stanley Berryhill III.  Jarell Broxton is one of the league’s best tackles, and James Butler (1,213 yards and 11 major scores) and Zander Horvath gave defences a running threat to worry about, too. BC was the only Canadian team to average over 8.0 yards a play, but their inability to run out the clock late against Saskatchewan cost them the Western Division Final and a Grey Cup berth. 


Calgary 11-7

With one off season move, it looked like the Stampeders might be on their way to the Grey Cup.  Following a November trade of draft picks with the Lions they picked up “Big Play V.A.”, thirty two year old former Oregon star QB Vernon Adams. Adams played in 17 regular-season games in 2025, posting an 11-6 record. He completed 280 of 429 passes – a 65.2-per cent success rate – for 4,247 yards, 21 touchdowns, and 14 interceptions. It was the second 4,000-yard season of his career. Adams also carried the ball 40 times for 332 yards, two touchdowns and a pair of two-point conversions.  The Stamps already had the CFL’s top runner by yards in Dedrick Mills, and a talented defensive front and secondary.  Mills, a 5’10’’ 238 pound back from Nebraska, gained 1,409 yards rushing with 11 major scores.  



Vernon Adams, Jr.

With their dangerous balance of running, downfield passing and defence the Stampeders raced out to an 8-3 start, just a half game behind Saskatchewan, and it looked like a home playoff game in McMahon Stadium was in the bag. Then the wheels game off- in one three game stretch Adams threw for only 6 touchdowns versus 11 interceptions, and the league saw fewer of his beautiful moon-ball deep shots to receivers Jalen Philpot, Dominique Rhymes, and Damien Alford. While Adams regained his form in time to clinch a postseason berth, the stumble allowed BC to overtake Calgary for second place and to take the Western Division Semi Final game for BC Place in Vancouver. There a late Stamps special teams fumble allowed Rourke and Co. to escape to the Western Final on a walkoff field goal. Calgary will be dangerous in any replay, though, they have the defence and offence to compete with anyone.


Winnipeg 10-8

In a league of offensive fireworks, Winnipeg still preferred to win in the old-fashioned CFL way- on special teams and defence. They possessed the CFL’s most dangerous long range kicker in Sergio Willis, who could fire through FGs from mid field. The return game was anchored by the CFL’s best return man, Trey Vaval; Vaval led the West in punt returns and average; among his many accomplishments was setting the CFL game yardage record for missed Field Goals on September 20 (199). The Minnesota Vikings liked Vaval so much they worked him out in the middle of the season.  The Bomber defence could stop the run and the pass, and they possessed a great all-around back in Brady Olviera (1,163 rushing yards, 61 catches for 546 yards - and he can block!) Add in excellent coaching, and a proven commodity in QB Zach Collaros along with a change of pace in scrambling reserve QB (and former NY Jet) Chris Streveler and Winnipeg had enough to make another playoff run, albeit in the East as a crossover team. But time and free agency had eroded their receiving corps and offensive line, and their reign of six straight Grey Cup appearances came to a close with a tough loss to Montreal in the Eastern Semifinals. 


Edmonton Elks 7-11

The Elks may have finished in fifth place in the West but they have a dynamic roster, led by veteran QB Cody Fajardo and RB Justin Rankin, a former Kent State player who scored 9 majors in runs while he added in 56 catches for 713 yards and four more TDs.  Rankin led the CFL in yards from scrimmage at 1,739 and he averaged a whopping 7.0 yards per touch.  Rankin had the CFL’s longest run in 2025 at 90 yards, and he was a threat to go the distance, either on passes or on the ground, every time he touched the ball. Edmonton also had the combined yards leader, Javon Leake, who tallied 2,424 yards on runs, catches, and returns (134.7 yards per game). 


Edmonton started the season 1-5 before a late August win streak and some solid play play in September brought them to 7-9 in early October, and on the brink of a possible playoff spot. Two tough losses to BC and Calgary ended those dreams, but Edmonton had built a solid foundation for the future. 


Fred Bobberts

Original Date of Publication: Jan 26, 2026




Monday, January 19, 2026

“My Maryland” Cards for the 1977 Hall of Fame Game (Maryland and Minnesota) for SOM College Football



Zip file of Cards for 1977-Maryland-Final-SOM-Cards.zip

Zip file of Cards for 1977-MINNESOTA-FINAL-SOM-Cards.zip


Strat-O-Matic College Football Posts on this Blog:


“My Maryland” Cards for the 1977 Hall of Fame Game for SOM College Football.  



Maryland sporting a 5-2 look against the 
Golden Gopher Veer.


The 1977-78 Hall of Fame Bowl (then called the Hall of Fame Classic) featured the Maryland Terrapins and the Minnesota Golden Gophers and it was played on December 22, 1977, in Birmingham, Alabama.  Both teams carried 7-4 records into the game, which marked Maryland’s 5th straight post-season bowl, but the first for Minnesota since 1962.


“That’s something Maryland has going for It,” Coach Cal Stoll of Minnesota said at the time, “For many of their players, it will be the third or fourth post-season game. But I think we have enough leadership on this team that they’ll know how to handle it.  Unfortunately the game didn’t exactly go the Gophers way.  Minnesota lost 17-7, with running back George Scott scoring two touchdowns for Maryland. 


For the Gophers, QB Mark Carlson led an opportunistic offense, and defensive tackle Steve Midboe received the team's Most Valuable Player award. Kicker Paul Rogind and Midboe were named All-Big Ten first team. Defensive tackle Mark Merrill, center Mark Slater and defensive back Bobby Weber were named All-Big Ten second team. Offensive lineman Dennis Fitzpatrick, offensive lineman Bryson Hollimon, defensive lineman Stan Sytsma and corner back Bob Weber were named Academic All-Big Ten. Coach Cal Stoll, in his sixth year at the helm, had one keynote win on their schedule, a 16-0 upset win at home against then #1 ranked Michigan to win the Little Brown Jug. It was the first time Michigan had been held scoreless in over 200 consecutive games. 



I definitely remember this one. 


Coach Jerry Claiborne’s Maryland was a touchdown favorite over the upset-minded Gophers. They had finished in a tie for third place in the Atlantic Coast Conference, and outscored their opponents 254 to 179.  (Minnesota had actually been outscored).  The team's statistical leaders included QB Larry Dick with 1,351 passing yards, George Scott with 894 rushing yards, and Vince Kinney with 505 receiving yards. The Terrapins had started 1-3 but they righted the ship, and only a tough 10-7 loss to North Carolina ended their hopes for more conference glory. 




The 1977 Hall of Fame Classic got started with Minnesota gaining the early upper hand.  Golden Golphers tailback Marion Barber rushed for a one-yard touchdown in the opening quarter to give his team a 7-0 lead. Barber is the father of former Minnesota and Dallas Cowboys running back Marion Barber III Maryland shut out Minnesota over the final three quarters and only allowed the Golden Gophers to accumulate 69 yards of total offense in the second half.


The Terps received two second quarter rushing touchdowns from tailback George Scott. Scott rushed 75 yards on 24 carries in the Maryland victory in Birmingham.  Kicker Mike Sochko added a 32-yard field goal in the first quarter.


The Terps held the advantage in both rushing yards (120-113) and passing yards (211-155). The Golden Gophers actually recorded 17 first downs to just 15 for the Terps, but Maryland was able to keep them off the scoreboard.


Claiborne would go on to be the second-winningest coach at Maryland as he put together a 77-37 mark during his 10 seasons with the program.   The Terps would only have one losing season over the next four years before Claiborne left for Kentucky.

Friday, January 16, 2026

Trust, But Verify - My Take on Sources

 





Trust, But Verify - My Take on Sources



 (An Oldie, but a Goodie!) 

I always sound defensive when I talk about this, so let me make one thing clear - I am not any smarter or any harder working when I research than anyone else. I have experience, though. I have been burned so badly on sources, and I have learned a very harsh lesson I have never forgotten. 

My first SOM projects were in both football and baseball, and they went pretty well. For 1957 I had a compilation right from the HOF that was solid out of the box, and for the 1983 USFL I had their guide and in order to get special teams materials I reconstructed team summaries from the box scores. There were only 72 boxes to enter, so this was easy. There were not many mistakes. Most of the stuff was complete, and therefore simple. 

Then came the greatest mess up I have ever made, my first attempt at the 1992 Japanese Season you see here later in the blog. I had good stuff for 1976, but for 1992 there was one mistake in the the league summary, a listed batting average for the league of .261 instead of .251. Since I start to frame a league using the averages, this little typo was devastating to 1992. I got to the very end, and I had four hundred batters and a hundred and sixty pitchers all individualized, but try as I might, when I ran the season it would not work. The normalization was off. I could not get the teams to balance.

In baseball, you can approximate sabermetrically the defensive outcomes for teams from their pitching lines, sum them, and compare these to the like summary of the total offensive numbers pretty easily. And the key thing here, Fred's First Law of Doing Baseball Teams is that the Sabermetrics Have to Match (and the same is true in football) in order to proceed. No league can be carded from incomplete data that will work (compile tabulations correctly) when you fire it up as a simulation.  

I did not do this for 1992 at first, only after I had chucked four months of solid work and started over did I reconstruct every team and then I found that one typo - ONE typo (!) that had killed the season’s simulation space. I watched it compile replay after replay that failed. It was a harsh lesson, and 1992 waited another two years for me to finish it (Lenny Durrant would remember this.)

I have a list of source types that I have had posted, and I will revisit it here, in order to clarify how I think about data. Simply put, I don’t have the time or energy to revisit every mistake pro-football reference has made or will make every time someone gets a game result they don't like and they cannot confirm it there. Their data constantly changes.  This sounds defensive to customers and I know that, but there has to be some “change control” process here, or this interaction will not work well for both sides.  

But on the other hand, and the Brammer guys know this after the Great Gino Marchetti Mistake of 1958, where my head rotated a full 360 degrees in front of the whole tournament field when I saw the cards for the first time, I will strike with great force on obvious typos or key mistakes that are confirmed. I think they were wondering if I was actually going to convert all ~100 kg of my mass to pure energy right there in that room.

Here goes:

*Game accounts I can watch or listen to (nothing beats film); 

If I can see players on the field in a game film from a certain date, or I have a good radio game account tells me something, I take that as read. Nothing else is as good as that.  

*Game accounts from a coach; 

Coaches notes tend to be well researched. Coaches are also much better sources than players. 

*Anything from the HOF; 

If I request something from them and they say - this is the best we have, that source is going to tend to trump any other materials I might have. That's not to say they cannot make mistakes, though. For many years they listed the record team offensive leaders in passing and they had the Rams 1950 figure of 3709 yards and over 300 yards per game as the record. They thought this was the net figure. Well, that is the LA gross passing figure. The Rams actually had, net, I found in a statistical guide from the era (the fifties were a boom time for written promotional annuals) lost 151 yards on sacks. Even the HOF was surprised when I pointed this out to them.  

*The Sporting News or a good PFRA article 

The Sporting News has a very high standard for stats, usually. Good PFRA materials can be useful, mostly as background. Stats can come from good or bad sources there. 

*Local newspapers 

Just under TSN, as they are not always standardized on how they report materials. 

*Listed articles from inserts, programs, or lineup cards; 

Since these are written BEFORE the game is played, lineups reported there may NOT account for injuries or late scratches. A lot of times these can be good for raising questions, looking for alternative positions, and confirming certain items you have seen elsewhere.  

*Team summaries (it depends on the team, Cleveland or the Giants definitely, the Cardinals not so much); 

There are just some teams that are very sensitive to their history and maintain a very high standard in protecting it. They may have dedicated staff to assist people who ask about their history. The Miami Dolphins and Cleveland Browns are relentless, both teams have collections of materials that have been written about their teams and franchises. The Giants have an archivist, and so do the Patriots. Some do not seem to cherish their history as much or have moved so often their materials have been lost. Arizona is in this camp, although I think they are getting better. Team sources are usually to confirm and to me they do not act as a primary source.  

*Encyclopedias, Media Guides, Yearbooks; 

I can give some good and bad examples of encyclopedias. On that Forum right now someone is asking about the '63 Chargers. My Neft and Cohen has no blocked punt data for the entire 1963 AFL. But it is highly unlikely an entire league punted over five hundred times in their third season without a blocked punt. My point is- if other sources parrot that data, there is a confusing element to the story. I see this and I will look elsewhere for that data, or assume if there is none that every team had a blocked punt.  

For the WFL my primary source is Maher and Speck's WFL Encyclopedia, but I have had to correct it. It is not bad, and for the data they had, it is probably excellent. It whips the more "professional" USFL Guides. But if I had edited it, I would have checked the simple things- do the compiled team offensive numbers match the totals of all the quarterbacks? Do the points for and against each team equal the sums of their scores? These are stats 101 items and on occasion they come up short.  

-At one point, the passing stats after a simple cleanup came up 59 yards short of the defensive end over 19,000 plus passing yards, comparing the offense to the defense. Boy, I searched awhile for that. It turned out this was the exact passing yardage for Jim Ettinger, third QB for the San Antonio Wings. I looked at the game accounts and he was a backup who came in for one last drive in a blowout game against the Charlotte Hornets. This was missed in the summary; they only compiled Johnny Walton's starting numbers. That kind of a mistake - the game's final drive, in garbage time- is very easy to make and entirely understandable. I've made it in my own writeups. In finding it I learned something about both teams.

-1975 Tommy Reamon is listed in this guide as having 144 carries for 278 yards for an average of 1.9 yards per carry and 5 TD with a longest of 44 yards. That might be the most ineffectual line ever posted by a starting halfback for a winning team, and what a strat card THAT would be.  

Since the totals for the running backs for 6-5 Jacksonville with this figure come up exactly 200 yards short of the team figure, it is not hard to see that this line ought to be 144 carries for 478 yards. You check the game accounts and sure enough, the summary figure is off. Too bad for George Mira, the starting QB, who would have had a Manning or Brady like card to compensate for that, carrying a winning team with no halfback. 

-The summary line for 1974 Birmingham has one PR TD but Willie Smith has two in his individual line.  

What I am saying is even good summary data needs to be checked on occasion. Make sure the offense matches the defense. Trust, but verify

*A book written about the season (although The First Season and Instant Replay were excellent Packer accounts). 

These are better for background (who started at what postion and then got benched, etc.) than as a primary source. Instant Replay was a play by play acccount, though, even without the Lions names, that's a pretty good source. 

*Player accounts (which are generally worthless for gaming purposes because players are not investigative journalists and they sometimes confuse years and teammates); 

I read a PFRA article about the 1950 Rams where the interviewee was Tom Fears. Fears would have been in his 70s and while he had some nice insights it took me about twenty seconds to figure out while the interviewer had asked specifically about the 1950 team, Fears had answered with observations from 1951 and 1954 as well. Some of the observations he made just did not occur in that season, some teammates should have come in later in the narrative.  

Players played, and their discussions of the game and opponents are very valuable, but taken as reporters, I do not think in general the details matter as much to them as they would to us as potential design inputs.

*Internet sources, which may pull confusing and conflicting materials from any of the above with no attribution. I trust nfl.com on modern materials, maybe not so much on historical materials without checking another source. 

Here we get to crux of the matter - the vast majority of people who are looking at the details start on the internet, with, say PFR, and end there, but these sources to me are execrable at best. I will - put simply - NOT - accept them as the final answer.  

They are hand entered, often unsupported or poorly so, and they will pull information from any or all of the above without attribution, so there is no way to know how consistent they have been in their research. If you want proof just enter in the offensive data for all of the players from 1958. Now get the NFL's Official Guide and count the mistakes. We trip over this in checking cards, longest runs, dots, these get missed here.  

I compiled playbooks from nfl.com last year and that is sometimes no better. They listed Bryant Johnson of the Lions as a tight end for half the season. He is and was a WR, he has many cards in the game as a WR. This was a mistake. The moment I see these kinds of inconsistencies I am going to pull up team blogs to settle disputes, find a newspaper account of the position struggle, or start watching those games myself. As good as they are they are not the final answer.  

The final answer usually is a balance of information from more than one place. People who seek certitude may not like this observation, but it is my take on the situation as I see it. If you have an observation found from the bottom of the above list, it is good to also check to see if something from above it squares with the item. 

Fred

Edit - 1963 San Diego Chargers

The question is usually "is this a mistake?" To me this means - was this entered in error? 

It looks to me that the SOM card data tracks nicely from the team results vs known punts in Neft and Cohen. If you subtract the punter's results from the team results you get the blocked punts: 

1963 AFL Team / Neft and Cohen difference / SOM blocks 

Boston-2 (SOM 12 block) 
Buffalo-1 (SOM 12 block) 
Denver-3 (SOM block 11) 
Houston-0 (SOM no block on card) 
KC-1 (SOM 12 block) 
NY-1 (SOM 12 block) 
Oak-1 (SOM 12 block) 
SD-1 (SOM 12 block) 

So the 1963 Charger block result is not a "mistake". Clearly there are no typographical errors here. If Houston had a block - that could be a typo, in this context. Now whether or not the choice of that source (Neft and Cohen) was "mistaken" - that is another question. If it is, well, we have the same issue then for other seasons. 

I know I have used similar results in a pinch for other fifties teams. I also know N&C is not perfect- if you tried to use the same trick for 1959 the punters and team results match perfectly, indicating no blocks by this method, which as I have said elsewhere is very unlikely. And I have the 1960 Record and Rules Manual ('59 data) and Philadelphia, Green Bay, and LA had blocked punts. 

Lee Segall put it best - a man with one watch knows the time, the man with two watches is never quite sure. Sometimes you have to say - I trust this source and it is what I am going to go with. This may just be an area where there is going to be uncomfortable disagreement - complete and accurate old football and baseball data is by its nature a pain to get. But having done this for awhile, I'm inclined to trust a consistent approach. 

I wish we could get to the point where people could trust those who are doing this work. That does not seem to be the way this customer base prefers to handle things. 

Fred
1-16-2026
Addendum: you’ll hear me say something is a slowly changing dimension. As an example, your address is not a fact, it’s a slowly changing dimension. At the moment I confirm it, your address is a fact. But addresses change, you may not have the same address in six months and you may not have lived there ten years ago. I have to also stipulate if it’s your home address, work address, ship to address, etc. 
Your birthday is a fact; it’s not changing. I don’t have to state any context alongside your birthday. 
The problem is to make teams you have to settle on a set of facts, from different sources in some cases, and make the determination a season can be modeled. I have everything I need to do a 1974, 1975, or 1976 CFL season, except that sacks aren’t official in the CFL either until 1981.  So unless I can find something from their Hall of Fame that can stand in for these numbers with some degree of reliability, that kind of project is on standby. 
For something like sacks which are unofficial data prior to 1982 in the NFL any compilation is likely to be a slowly changing dimension, meaning it changes over time as more people might look at it. When I first did a 1972 Miami set for Glenn in 1989 (!) I used data right from the Dolphins media guide. I got 1978 Pittsburgh’s data from the Steelers. I see now looking in the game that these changed; it’s not a big deal because pass rush points allocations have some leeway anyway and those team totals in the game seem right. But dimensions like these always have a caveat- they were the best representation at the time the season was made
If you can’t say this caveat, well- what happens if you base a determination from just an internet source, that is, some guy had x sacks when originally you had them at zero, and so you revise the season- but then the number gets changed back to zero on the internet a year later? This can happen; it has happened. You’d be chasing your tail with revisions because the source itself is unreliable. This is what change control means. 

Fred (again)